<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do library goers have time for Library 2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/</link>
	<description>Can enterprise and transparency mix?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadisha Sigera</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadisha Sigera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=111#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I agree with this comment.... Though there are so many tools and technologies that can be adopted to libraries only few people will realise it and spend some time in analysing the benefits. Still Library 2.0 is in its first stage where the organisations are not very interested in taking actions to utilise web2.0 tools and they are still in a dought whether the implementation will bring them enough profits.&lt;br&gt;The library users are still not aware of the available tools and they still dont feel the requirement of them. QUT library is a good example where they use some of the web2.0 tools but the users still are not aware of those facilities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post and good points have raised here&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this comment&#8230;. Though there are so many tools and technologies that can be adopted to libraries only few people will realise it and spend some time in analysing the benefits. Still Library 2.0 is in its first stage where the organisations are not very interested in taking actions to utilise web2.0 tools and they are still in a dought whether the implementation will bring them enough profits.<br />The library users are still not aware of the available tools and they still dont feel the requirement of them. QUT library is a good example where they use some of the web2.0 tools but the users still are not aware of those facilities. </p>
<p>Great post and good points have raised here<br />Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadisha Sigera</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadisha Sigera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=111#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I agree with this comment.... Though there are so many tools and technologies that can be adopted to libraries only few people will realise it and spend some time in analysing the benefits. Still Library 2.0 is in its first stage where the organisations are not very interested in taking actions to utilise web2.0 tools and they are still in a dought whether the implementation will bring them enough profits.&lt;br&gt;The library users are still not aware of the available tools and they still dont feel the requirement of them. QUT library is a good example where they use some of the web2.0 tools but the users still are not aware of those facilities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post and good points have raised here&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this comment&#8230;. Though there are so many tools and technologies that can be adopted to libraries only few people will realise it and spend some time in analysing the benefits. Still Library 2.0 is in its first stage where the organisations are not very interested in taking actions to utilise web2.0 tools and they are still in a dought whether the implementation will bring them enough profits.<br />The library users are still not aware of the available tools and they still dont feel the requirement of them. QUT library is a good example where they use some of the web2.0 tools but the users still are not aware of those facilities. </p>
<p>Great post and good points have raised here<br />Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cofiem</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>cofiem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=111#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Everyone can do with more time. It&#039;s precious. Anything that is implemented in the library (and anywhere else, for that matter), should enable people to get things done faster, or replace other things. Adding tasks to an already tight schedule is not the way to go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone can do with more time. It&#39;s precious. Anything that is implemented in the library (and anywhere else, for that matter), should enable people to get things done faster, or replace other things. Adding tasks to an already tight schedule is not the way to go.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamiecturner</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/09/do-library-goers-have-time-for-library-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>jamiecturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=111#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I think your first point for deeper analysis there is one of the main issues I have been taking into consideration when thinking about the QUT library. Sure there are plenty of technologies and they are all useful, but will people sit down to figure them out, play around or continuously check for updates?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;great issues raised here, good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your first point for deeper analysis there is one of the main issues I have been taking into consideration when thinking about the QUT library. Sure there are plenty of technologies and they are all useful, but will people sit down to figure them out, play around or continuously check for updates?</p>
<p>great issues raised here, good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

