<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 at QUT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/07/enterprise-20-at-qut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/07/enterprise-20-at-qut/</link>
	<description>Can enterprise and transparency mix?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Van Dyk</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/07/enterprise-20-at-qut/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Van Dyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=3#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comments on my site. The biggest point here which I agree with is the &quot;buzz words&quot; that are used. web 2.0. I&#039;ve been against it for a while, but the buzz word is sticking with everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although your right, and I&#039;m starting to use the word myself as everyday language. It serves its purpose, and it is doing it well for the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark.<br />Thanks for your comments on my site. The biggest point here which I agree with is the &#8220;buzz words&#8221; that are used. web 2.0. I&#39;ve been against it for a while, but the buzz word is sticking with everyone.</p>
<p>Although your right, and I&#39;m starting to use the word myself as everyday language. It serves its purpose, and it is doing it well for the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Van Dyk</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/07/enterprise-20-at-qut/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Van Dyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comments on my site. The biggest point here which I agree with is the &quot;buzz words&quot; that are used. web 2.0. I&#039;ve been against it for a while, but the buzz word is sticking with everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although your right, and I&#039;m starting to use the word myself as everyday language. It serves its purpose, and it is doing it well for the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark.<br />Thanks for your comments on my site. The biggest point here which I agree with is the &#8220;buzz words&#8221; that are used. web 2.0. I&#39;ve been against it for a while, but the buzz word is sticking with everyone.</p>
<p>Although your right, and I&#39;m starting to use the word myself as everyday language. It serves its purpose, and it is doing it well for the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cofiem</title>
		<link>http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/2009/07/enterprise-20-at-qut/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>cofiem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise.anotherbyte.net/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the Wikipedia &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_social_software&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;entry for Enterprise 2.0&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe we could make it a project to update and clean it up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s the Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_social_software" rel="nofollow">entry for Enterprise 2.0</a>. Maybe we could make it a project to update and clean it up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

